Enjoy!
Rhonda
By Lisa Saunders
Over our history there have been and continue to be many
great debates: is the world flat or round, does God exist, are carbohydrates
good or bad? Within educational circles one
debate rages on; what is the best way to teach our kids? Traditional education offers the stability
and predictability of reading, writing and arithmetic, long-established customs found in schools that our society
has historically deemed appropriate. Progressive
education, on the other hand, has the qualities of well-rounded education that western
society has come to covet; a focus on each student’s strengths and interests,
assessing in various ways that support diverse learners.
Throughout the past 100 years many studies have been carried
out with the sole purpose of investigating how we learn. Many of these studies have shown an
overwhelming amount of evidence supporting the implementation of the
characteristics of progressive education: individual
instruction, informality in the classroom, multi-sensory teaching practices and
the use of group discussions and laboratories as instructional techniques. Successful implementation of this very
practice has been seen all over the world.
From establishment of progressive education techniques by John Dewey in
the early 1900’s to the public uprising against the No Child Left Behind Act,
progressive education has been a supported teaching practice spanning over two
centuries, albeit with varied success.
As long as we have administrators and policy makers fully immersed in
traditional education, progression will not be fully realized. Difficulty lies in separating the two ideas
in that, elements of traditional education: external motivation, memorization
of rote facts and concentration on skills in reading, writing and math, are
sewn into the very fabric of our educational system.
Each generation experiences the
upcoming generation doing things a little bit differently – how did our parent’s
parents feel about television, or our parents feel about computers; how do we
feel about social networking and assistive technology? These tools can be seen as barriers to
learning or they can be seen as tools, stepping stones for the next generation
to express what we have taught them. As each generation learns more about how the
next generation of students learn, educators attempt to predict what skills
will be most beneficial in the next generation’s society. Central skills include the need for workers to
have a proficient ability to receive, store, process and communicate
information. Teaching our students to be
independent thinkers will always serve them, no matter their career
choice.
Critics in education will
always exist, projecting their view on an education system that is slow to
change and seems to cater to the average student. The essence of learning is not to regurgitate
facts, memorized for that expressed purpose, rather it is to understand,
investigate and discover in a way that is meaningful to each of us. As we are all different in thoughts,
experiences and viewpoints, so must our learning and evaluation be diverse from
that of our classmates. There are many
students who have gifts that reach far beyond memorizing multiplication tables
and mastering spelling bees, who require creative and out-of-the-box teachers
to guide them towards becoming the forward thinkers of the next generation.
It makes sense to tailor
education to each individual. Though many of our traditionalist teachers and
administrators work in their comfort zone, relying on those methods that were
bestowed upon them as students, we all
want to teach and support our next generation of children in a way that will be
beneficial to society. Teach a student
what to think and humanity stays stagnant, teach a student how to think and who
knows how far we will go.
What are your thoughts on education in the future? Share them in the comments section below!
No comments:
Post a Comment